- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:21:50 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Roy, does that mean we would not need a DNT:0 signal anymore? In this case we would have to adapt the protocol. For the rest of your message, it is very interesting but more than I can digest tonight after 2 days in London. I understood that your suggestion would mean a change in protocol that would make work DNT with old browsers. for the ad-networks you need explicit/explicit so the browser can send the allowance to selected auction companies who get a DNT:0 (or cookie) that would allow tranistory permission for this auction. Because I don't think you can solve the auction problem without transitory permissions. But those would be under purpose limitation and without the possibility of secondary use. I think we had that discussion in Washington. --Rigo On Friday 26 April 2013 12:55:22 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > After consent is granted, the site sets a cookie and the user agent > would thereafter send something like > > DNT: 1 > Cookie: w3dnt=0
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 20:22:18 UTC