Matthias,
Acceptance of the new exception model turns on a meaningful exception consent standard. I'm uncertain if that caveat is sufficiently reflected in your proposal or if CLOSED is the appropriate status.
Jonathan
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
> CONTEXT
> I believe that we all team members can live with the new approach to
> exception.
>
> In this model, the site controls the user experience and registers an
> exception
> with the browser once it is certain that the exception reflects actual
> informed consent a user.
>
> How to define requirements that ensure that sites reliably collect such
> consent are currently under discussion.
>
> PROPOSAL
>
> In order to make progress, Jonathan and I agreed on the following steps.
> suggest the following steps:
> 1. I have created ISSUE-194 that formalises this concern.
> 2. I have inserted ISSUE-194 into the corresponding section 6.3.1 of the
> TPE spec
> This clearly documents that we still need to resolve ISSUE-194 in
> the TPE
> 3. I would like to now close ISSUE-187
>
> ALL:
> - If you are not OK with closing ISSUE-187 by down-scoping it to ISSUE-194,
> please respond by Monday (April 15).
>
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> matthias