- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:31:59 +0200
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: <public-tracking@w3.org>
See reply to mail from Matthias. Roy T. Fielding schreef op 2013-04-23 10:42: > On Apr 23, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote: > >> Counterproposal: Silence i.e. no text. >> >> OOBC for panel members and the problem of the pixels not being able >> to talk DNT is an innovation problem for audience measurement >> industry. Making the problem go away by not calling it a problem under >> DNT anymore is not acceptable for me and probably more privacy >> advocates. >> >> Rob > > Why? What is the privacy concern you have with the proposal? > > The only personal data being used is with prior consent, and the > retention period for determining that consent is far shorter than > for any of the permitted uses. That is a far more effective > solution than "not calling it a problem". > > ....Roy
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:32:36 UTC