- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:42:51 -0700
- To: <rob@blaeu.com>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
On Apr 23, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Rob van Eijk wrote: > Counterproposal: Silence i.e. no text. > > OOBC for panel members and the problem of the pixels not being able to talk DNT is an innovation problem for audience measurement industry. Making the problem go away by not calling it a problem under DNT anymore is not acceptable for me and probably more privacy advocates. > > Rob Why? What is the privacy concern you have with the proposal? The only personal data being used is with prior consent, and the retention period for determining that consent is far shorter than for any of the permitted uses. That is a far more effective solution than "not calling it a problem". ....Roy
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 08:43:18 UTC