- From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:04:15 -0400
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: Sid Stamm <sid@mozilla.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>
Rigo - I don't have any issue with bundling conceptually -- so long as the UA is able to meet the guidelines to ensure that the User is making an informed choice in line with general principles of privacy. Alan On 4/13/13 5:24 PM, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org> wrote: >Sid, > >your vision really sounds good to me. And I agree that DNT is a tool in >the box, not more. I agree that browsers could use that tool in various >ways. Bundling the tool with other tools is clearly where browsers >compete. So I don't think the TPE or TCS should prohibit or preclude or >require other things. > >I would hope though, that the UI for switching that mode allows for >simple, comprehensive and natural choices and makes it as easy to turn >DNT:1 on as it is to turn DNT:0 on. > > --Rigo > >On Thursday 11 April 2013 07:42:24 Sid Stamm wrote: >> But at the same time, there's lots of related privacy features that >> can be combined into one user experience; I can imagine a "tracking >> protection" mode or something that enables DNT but also does some >> other stuff with web cookies, cache, etc. I think this should be >> allowed, even though in this case DNT enablement is part of the >> "meta-feature". >> >> On the other hand, I can also imagine a personalization mode that, >> when enabled, turns on DNT:0, logs them into a social API endpoint, >> and starts mashing up data for a more personal web experience. In >> this case, DNT is not central to the personalization mode, but >> clearly helpful and should not be prohibited even though it's not the >> complete story for this mode. > >
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 13:04:49 UTC