- From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:23:18 -0700
- To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <983C23D6655E4239A853E916DD8127AA@gmail.com>
I'm totally fine with separating the exception consent standard and exception model discussions into separate ISSUEs. That seems like reasonable organization. If I'm not mistaken, we have a new status for an ISSUE that is resolved but with a deep dependency on the outcome of another ISSUE. That seems to me the right status here: if we cannot establish a rigorous consent standard, then I (and based on discussions, several others) would not be comfortable with the new exception model. Jonathan On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > > while composing the agenda for today, I have realised that your concern > of an insufficient user experience > for agreeing to exception (the race to the bottom) is somewhat > independent of ISSUE-187: > > - In the "old" approach to exceptions, we need some guidance to prevent > that some BROWSERS > store exceptions without asking the user > - In the "new" approach to exceptions, we need some guidance to prevent > that some SITES > store exceptions without asking the user > > I see this as a valid concern for both approaches to exceptions (and > similarly also for the initial gathering of preferences). > > As a consequence, I suggest the following way forward: > - We create a new ISSUE on "Rules for sufficient user interaction to > ensure that a user actually agrees with an exception" (or a similar wording) > and include this as OPEN in the database and the current TPE draft > - I will try to close ISSUE 187 while stating that this new issue needs > resolving (but that we overall try to work > towards the new approach to exceptions). > > I hope that this addresses your concern of a "race to the bottom" while > still giving the group a stable path for the exception framework. > > Would this work? If yes, I will send a mail to the announce list to > formally implement this down-scoping of ISSUE-187. > > > Regards, > matthias > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 15:23:49 UTC