W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > April 2013

Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:24:57 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Sid Stamm <sid@mozilla.com>, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>
Message-ID: <4539131.sqCxaBkxuP@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

your vision really sounds good to me. And I agree that DNT is a tool in 
the box, not more. I agree that browsers could use that tool in various 
ways. Bundling the tool with other tools is clearly where browsers 
compete. So I don't think the TPE or TCS should prohibit or preclude or 
require other things. 

I would hope though, that the UI for switching that mode allows for 
simple, comprehensive and natural choices and makes it as easy to turn 
DNT:1 on as it is to turn DNT:0 on. 


On Thursday 11 April 2013 07:42:24 Sid Stamm wrote:
> But at the same time, there's lots of related privacy features that
> can be combined into one user experience; I can imagine a "tracking
> protection" mode or something that enables DNT but also does some
> other stuff with web cookies, cache, etc.  I think this should be
> allowed, even though in this case DNT enablement is part of the
> "meta-feature".
> On the other hand, I can also imagine a personalization mode that,
> when enabled, turns on DNT:0, logs them into a social API endpoint,
> and starts mashing up data for a more personal web experience.  In
> this case, DNT is not central to the personalization mode, but
> clearly helpful and should not be prohibited even though it's not the
> complete story for this mode.
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2013 21:25:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:29 UTC