public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014 by author

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Exotic OBJECT? (Wednesday, 13 August)

Andreas Rossberg

• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Anonymous Dictionary Question (Wednesday, 2 July)

Arthur Barstow

• RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Monday, 4 August)

Boris Zbarsky

• Making sequences distinguishable from dictionaries (and interfaces and callbacks) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable (Friday, 12 September)
• Re: Use of "required" dictionary attributes for events (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Use of "required" dictionary attributes for events (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: [webidl] Defining constructors on non-global objects? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: [webidl] Defining constructors on non-global objects? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Anonymous Dictionary Question (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Wednesday, 2 July)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Tuesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Tuesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Tuesday, 30 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23202] Add @@unscopeables sugar (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Sunday, 28 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Sunday, 28 September)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Sunday, 28 September)
• [Bug 26901] New: Stop using "octet" (Thursday, 25 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 25457] Adding "AutocompleteError" to error names table (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Tuesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Tuesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 23683] Investigate restricting sequence<T> to iterables (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 26767] An invalid dictionary member value whose type is an enumeration (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 26767] An invalid dictionary member value whose type is an enumeration (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 26767] An invalid dictionary member value whose type is an enumeration (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 26767] An invalid dictionary member value whose type is an enumeration (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 26767] New: An invalid dictionary member value whose type is an enumeration (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 24652] Deal with associated Realms (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 24652] Deal with associated Realms (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 24652] Deal with associated Realms (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 22346] Security: Check origins when invoking a method, getter, or setter on an object using the property descriptor of another (Sunday, 7 September)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Friday, 29 August)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Thursday, 28 August)
• [Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values (Wednesday, 27 August)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Saturday, 23 August)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Saturday, 23 August)
• [Bug 25015] "asynchromous" (Wednesday, 20 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Friday, 15 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Thursday, 14 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Thursday, 14 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Thursday, 14 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Thursday, 14 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26524] New: replace [SameObject] with [Cached]? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26490] Prevent freezing/sealing objects by having [[PreventExtensions]] return false (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26521] New: [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 26517] Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 26517] New: Methods that return promises are unable to throw exceptions (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 26452] Consider introducing explicit syntax for mixins (Friday, 1 August)
• [Bug 26490] New: Prevent freezing/sealing objects by having [[PreventExtensions]] return false (Thursday, 31 July)
• [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26452] New: Consider introducing explicit syntax for mixins (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26451] New: Consider disallowing implements chains (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 23367] Move exceptions into IDL (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 26075] Identifiers production duplicated (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird (Monday, 28 July)
• [Bug 25495] Behavior of no [Exposed] on interface members is weird (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 26425] New: Drop the default for [Exposed] (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Wednesday, 23 July)
• [Bug 24959] "Exposed=Window,Worker" will be parsed to 2 extended attributes (Tuesday, 22 July)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Friday, 11 July)
• [Bug 26303] Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Friday, 11 July)
• [Bug 26303] New: Add a way to have required dictionary entries (Thursday, 10 July)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)

Chris Lilley

• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Tuesday, 22 July)

David Bruant

• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Friday, 18 July)

Dirk Schulze

• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Friday, 18 July)
• [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)

Domenic Denicola

• RE: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• RE: [webidl] Defining constructors on non-global objects? (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: [webidl] Defining constructors on non-global objects? (Friday, 5 September)
• RE: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• RE: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Adding [Reflect] to WebIDL? (Thursday, 7 August)
• RE: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Monday, 21 July)
• RE: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Monday, 21 July)
• RE: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• RE: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)
• RE: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)

Erik Arvidsson

• Re: Adding [Reflect] to WebIDL? (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Monday, 21 July)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Tuesday, 26 August)

Garrett Smith

• Re: Exotic OBJECT? (Wednesday, 13 August)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Use of "required" dictionary attributes for events (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Adding [Reflect] to WebIDL? (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• RE: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jake Archibald

• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)

Jason Ausborn

• Anonymous Dictionary Question (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jason Orendorff

• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Friday, 26 September)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Tuesday, 29 July)

Juan Ignacio Dopazo

• Questions about the Fetch API (Tuesday, 8 July)

Kostiainen, Anssi

• [webidl] Defining constructors on non-global objects? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)

Marcos Caceres

• Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 25 August)
• Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• RE: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• RE: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: Anonymous Dictionary Question (Wednesday, 2 July)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: Should / Can an EventHandler throw a stack overflow exception? (Tuesday, 1 July)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 1 September)

Ms2ger

• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Saturday, 19 July)

Olli Pettay

• Re: Use of "required" dictionary attributes for events (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)

Rafael Weinstein

• Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Monday, 25 August)

Remco

• Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 27 August)

Rick Waldron

• Re: [webidl] Defining constructors on non-global objects? (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Friday, 5 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 1 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Tuesday, 26 August)

Rik Cabanier

• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)
• Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors (Tuesday, 1 July)

Robin Berjon

• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)

Sigbjorn Finne

• Re: Adding [Reflect] to WebIDL? (Friday, 8 August)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Use of "required" dictionary attributes for events (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker" (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: [WebIDL] Remove ArrayClass? (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments (Wednesday, 9 July)

Tim Volodine

• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Friday, 5 September)

Tobie Langel

• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Monday, 8 September)
• Re: Ambient light API redesign (Friday, 29 August)

Tom Van Cutsem

• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Violations of internal method invariants? (Thursday, 31 July)

Travis Leithead

• RE: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Thursday, 28 August)
• RE: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform (Thursday, 28 August)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: Should / Can an EventHandler throw a stack overflow exception? (Wednesday, 2 July)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2014 11:11:28 UTC