RE: Promise<void> or Promise<undefined>?, was Re: RfC: pre-LC version of Screen Orientation; deadline August 18 from Marcos Caceres on 2014-08-14 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:06:08 -0400
To: public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <etPan.53ed24c0.625558ec.e7a@Marcoss-MacBook-Pro.local>

On August 14, 2014 at 5:01:24 PM, Marcos Caceres (marcos@marcosc.com) wrote:
> > I don't feel strongly about it either. To me, it's probably more  
> clear to just say "resolve p", because it doesn't imply that one  
> is passing an actual thing to the resolver (where "resolve p"*

* Sorry, here I meant "resolve p with `undefined`"
   
> looks like, in a JS implementation of WebIDL: `resolver(undefined)`  
> even if equivalent to just calling `resolver()`). I guess generally,  
> unless one is resolving with something, maybe it's best to just  
> exclude the "" altogether, as it's should be implied to  
> be void.

Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 21:06:37 UTC