W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: How to correctly spec sequences requiring an iterable

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:43:28 -0400
Message-ID: <54126BE0.9080501@mit.edu>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 9/11/14, 10:03 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Following up on this: per more recent discussion, I'm going to make this
> more like Array.from instead. So replace step 3 with "If the value is
> undefined, move on to the next union member".

And the spec has now been updated accordingly.

Note that Gecko has been shipping the previous behavior I suggested, but 
it's a simple change to update to the new one.

Looking forward to other implementations updating to 
sequence-as-iterable as well.

-Boris
Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 03:43:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:22 UTC