- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 05:54:16 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19936 --- Comment #9 from Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> --- "None of the above" is not the same as "not present". For example: navigator.getUserMedia({ video: {} }) means "unconstrained", give me any camera, I don't care which way it faces. But navigator.getUserMedia({ video: { facingMode: { exact: "blah" }, } }) must NOT succeed, because the caller is requiring a direction known to them but unknown to the (old) browser. Likewise: navigator.getUserMedia({ video: { advanced: [ { facingMode: "blah", aspectRatio: 16/9}, // multi-constraint { facingMode: "user"}, // single constraint ] } }) is required to satisfy both "blah" and 16/9 or give up and move to the next entry. In other words, if it doesn't know "blah" then it should not limit user-facing cameras to 16/9. Travis' suggestion doesn't have the this problem, or the problem with sequences. We can define: enum VideoFacingModeEnum { "user", "environment", "left", "right" "other" = default }; and blah turns into facingMode: ["user", "other", "left"] just fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 05:54:17 UTC