Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors

> On Jul 10, 2014, at 9:42, "Rik Cabanier" <> wrote:
> It was to avoid introducing another instance. Is there a way in IDL to have a constructor but not have the class available in the global object? 

Even if there is not now, there is going to be a huge need for this feature once modules start arriving and we no longer need to stuff everything onto the global object.

Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 16:44:25 UTC