- From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 20:43:15 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 20 August 2014 17:49, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, still, reversing the question - are enough properties observable > that it would be better to have an [Unobservable] extended attribute > for them, and assume that anything else is observable? Would really > cut down on the IDL spam. Just make sure not to spec anything before you are sure that it doesn't cost substantial performance. In Chrome, the V8/Blink boundary is particularly sensitive to that. /Andreas
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:44:12 UTC