Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform

On 20 August 2014 17:49, Tab Atkins Jr. <> wrote:
> Well, still, reversing the question - are enough properties observable
> that it would be better to have an [Unobservable] extended attribute
> for them, and assume that anything else is observable?  Would really
> cut down on the IDL spam.

Just make sure not to spec anything before you are sure that it
doesn't cost substantial performance. In Chrome, the V8/Blink boundary
is particularly sensitive to that.


Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:44:12 UTC