[Bug 26183] make it easier to define an iterator on an interface that iterates over a set of values from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org on 2014-08-28 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 02:01:06 +0000
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-26183-3890-L2neEK4q5r@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26183

Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jackalmage@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Domenic Denicola from comment #3)
> ### Unsure
> 
> SetLikeIterable => like MapLikeIterable, but with the (admittedly weird) set
> semantics where keys and values are the same, and entries are just [v, v]
> arrays.
> 
> Do we have any use case for this?

Well, we have Set-like objects, such as FontFaceSet.

~TJ

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 02:01:08 UTC