- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:03:10 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26303 --- Comment #4 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > Defaulting to an empty ArrayBuffer is not making it required though. Right, they have some optional things that they want to default to empty ArrayBuffers. They have other things that they want to be required, with no defaulting. > Will we throw TypeError or some such for these cases? That would be the idea, yes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2014 13:03:11 UTC