Re: Would it make sense for Web IDL [[Call]] to do the current execution context munging that ES6 functions' default [[Call]] does? from Boris Zbarsky on 2014-08-28 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:11:15 -0400
To: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <53FF7ED3.2010608@mit.edu>

On 8/28/14, 3:06 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Well, ES basically considers anything with a [[Call]] internal method to be a function object of one sort or another.

Right, I understand that.

But the point is that we're defining some sort of object and we want to 
say that it has a [[Call]].  Then we need to say what its [[Call]] is. 
Just explicitly saying it's the [[Call]] that 9.3.1 defines should be 
pretty good, though.

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 19:11:45 UTC