Re: Move sync APIs out of "Worker" into "SyncWorker"

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it makes sense to do one of the following?:
>
> * Expose the sync methods on DedicatedWorker only - this would require usage
> stats of sync methods in SharedWorkers to be insignificant
> * Expose the sync methods on a new global SyncWorker, where
> DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope would be
> [Global=Worker,SyncWorker,DedicatedWorker], SharedWorkerGlobalScope would be
> [Global=Worker,SyncWorker,SharedWorker]

I like the first option if we can make it fly. Jonas probably has
concerns. Ian will need to update HTML for the second option to work.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2014 15:50:44 UTC