Re: Exposing constructors of readonly interfaces to web authors

On 7/10/14, 12:42 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> It was to avoid introducing another instance. Is there a way in IDL to
> have a constructor but not have the class available in the global object?

No, but we could certainly add such a thing.  However, why is that 
desirable?  What use is a constructor you can't get hold of without 
weird tricks?


Received on Thursday, 10 July 2014 16:48:09 UTC