Re: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Domenic Denicola
<> wrote:
> I guess I was approaching it from the perspective that implementing observability requires extra work, and so calling that out as an attribute makes most sense. That is a somewhat implementer-ey perspective, though.

Given that it would be new and actually does require work as well as
some specification work (in terms of task scheduling) calling it out
seems most appropriate to me. We can always flip it later if it turns
out we are adding this all over.


Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 19:01:16 UTC