W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2014

RE: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy

From: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:05:49 +0000
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, FX <public-fx@w3.org>, "ms2ger@gmail.com" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f9c32a2f0ffe4571b8bc45ae5201c623@BN1PR05MB325.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dirk Schulze [mailto:dschulze@adobe.com] 

> We can not use "MUST NOT" because then no interface can use it at all - not even getClientsRect() :). "SHOULD NOT" is the right technical term though. Are you fine with that?

I'm feeling bad for continuing the back-and-forth on such a trivial point, but what about "APIs besides getClientRects() MUST NOT"?
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 19:06:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:22 UTC