- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 04:42:25 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19936 --- Comment #8 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> --- For HTMLCanvasElement.getContext, I'm thinking now that a DOMString expresses the intent better: context names can be any string, and the defined behaviour of getContext is to return null for a context type it doesn't support. For HTMLInputElement.type (an IDL attribute "limited to only known values"), assigning any string causes the content attribute to be given that value, but getting its value will only the default value (or the empty string for some) if the value of the content attribute is not valid. The behaviour here seems a bit different from HTMLCanvasElement.getContext. For Navigator.getUserMedia, the facing mode value can be used either directly as the value of dictionary members MediaTrackConstraintSet.facingMode and ConstrainVideoFacingModeParameters.{exact,ideal} or in a sequence that is the value of those dictionary members. I was going to suggest something like: dictionary MediaTrackConstraintSet { ... [LenientEnum] ConstrainVideoFacingMode facingMode; }; which would make navigator.getUserMedia({ video: { advanced: [ { facingMode: "blah" } ] } }) treat the facingMode dictionary member as "not present" since it doesn't have a matching value. But this leads to the question of how to treat the values inside the sequence<VideoFacingModeEnum>, e.g. if you write navigator.getUserMedia({ video: { advanced: [ { facingMode: ["user", "blah", "left"] } ] } }) or navigator.getUserMedia({ video: { advanced: [ { facingMode: { exact: ["user", "blah", "left"] } } ] } }) There's no concept of "not present" for sequence values, so prose is going to have to handle the "blah" value. I think it would be strange to allow the JS Array -> sequence<VideoFacingModeEnum> conversion to skip invalid elements. So this makes me think that all of this should be done with a DOMString and handled in prose, actually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 04:42:26 UTC