Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments

On 7/9/14, 1:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> So, I think the restriction on stringifier args should be loosened to
> only require that all args be marked optional.

Alternately, we could stop pretending we're supporting languages other 
than JS and just have people write "toString" when they mean "toString", 
instead of the indirection with "stringifier".

-Boris

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 06:51:54 UTC