- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 01:05:05 -0400
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, FX <public-fx@w3.org>
On 7/17/14, 5:37 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > With the current limitations of WebIDL, does it mean you prefer using [ArrayClass]? (Instead of subclassing Array?). For green-field things, I would prefer just using an Array for now, then doing subclassing once it's implemented. For legacy stuff, subclassing Array is not an option thus far, because none of the JS engines support subclassing yet. This has nothing to do with WebIDL limitations; it's a V8/SpiderMonkey/Chakra/JSC limitation. > Does that work together with [NoInterfaceObject] You mean [ArrayClass]? Yes, it does. > and would you even consider it? Consider [NoInterfaceObject], you mean? I could probably live with that, yes. -Boris
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 05:08:37 UTC