[Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23682

--- Comment #18 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> ---
(In reply to Anne from comment #17)
> I don't think it's confusing for A and B and in fact I thought we already
> agreed that it wasn't. Being able to mutate the array you get back is how
> JavaScript works.

If that's the case, why do we have 'readonly' attributes in the DOM at all?

> D would require something special either way. One idea was to have a mutable
> array with Object.observe() attached. I'm not sure what the latest on that
> is.

Did you read comment 12? That clearly shows that there are multiple
alternatives here.

You're acting like all of this has been decided somewhere. If that's the case,
please provide references. It'd also be nice if that group of people who made
that decision had commented in this bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 09:43:32 UTC