Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Boris Zbarsky <> wrote:
> On 7/9/14, 1:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> So, I think the restriction on stringifier args should be loosened to
>> only require that all args be marked optional.
> Alternately, we could stop pretending we're supporting languages other than
> JS and just have people write "toString" when they mean "toString", instead
> of the indirection with "stringifier".

That would also be acceptable, yes.


Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 15:32:48 UTC