Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2014-07-09 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:32:01 -0700
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBGxKgRQ8-0Hbu83nbi7jCwOFy2-nPpE4oxhPYrZe5+eQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 7/9/14, 1:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> So, I think the restriction on stringifier args should be loosened to
>> only require that all args be marked optional.
>
> Alternately, we could stop pretending we're supporting languages other than
> JS and just have people write "toString" when they mean "toString", instead
> of the indirection with "stringifier".

That would also be acceptable, yes.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 15:32:48 UTC