W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: [webidl] Stringifiers should allow optional arguments

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:51:36 +0200
Message-ID: <53BD6508.3030905@w3.org>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 09/07/2014 17:32 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On 7/9/14, 1:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>> So, I think the restriction on stringifier args should be loosened to
>>> only require that all args be marked optional.
>>
>> Alternately, we could stop pretending we're supporting languages other than
>> JS and just have people write "toString" when they mean "toString", instead
>> of the indirection with "stringifier".
>
> That would also be acceptable, yes.

And if we could kill serializer with the same stone, all the better.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 15:51:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:22 UTC