RE: Object.observe()able properties on the web platform

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>

> Well, still, reversing the question - are enough properties observable that it would be better to have an [Unobservable] extended attribute for them, and assume that anything else is observable?  Would really cut down on the IDL spam.

I guess I was approaching it from the perspective that implementing observability requires extra work, and so calling that out as an attribute makes most sense. That is a somewhat implementer-ey perspective, though.

Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 18:57:13 UTC