Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform

On August 26, 2014 at 10:49:03 AM, Frederick Hirsch ( wrote:
> Is now a good time to take the WakeLock thread to the DAP public list?

No, it's not necessary. Also, I think we've settled on the design that Jonas is proposing. 

After we (the editors) draft that up, we will take it to DAP for refinement. 

Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 17:11:43 UTC