Re: Wake Lock API as [Observable] candidate, Re: [whatwg] Object.observe()able properties on the web platform from Marcos Caceres on 2014-08-26 (public-script-coord@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:11:27 -0400
To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Message-ID: <etPan.53fcbfbf.6b68079a.3cdf@Marcoss-MacBook-Pro.local>

On August 26, 2014 at 10:49:03 AM, Frederick Hirsch (w3c@fjhirsch.com) wrote:
> Is now a good time to take the WakeLock thread to the DAP public list?

No, it's not necessary. Also, I think we've settled on the design that Jonas is proposing. 

After we (the editors) draft that up, we will take it to DAP for refinement.

Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 17:11:43 UTC