W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: [geometry] DOMRectList with legacy

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 19:03:54 +0000
To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, FX <public-fx@w3.org>, "ms2ger@gmail.com" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <91058DB4-411E-4252-BF4F-119296357800@adobe.com>

On Jul 21, 2014, at 8:18 PM, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:

> From: Dirk Schulze [mailto:dschulze@adobe.com] 
> 
>> I made the changes to the specification. You can find it here:  http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/#DOMRectList
>> 
>> Anne, Domenic, Ms2ger, please reply if you agree that your concerns have been addressed.
> 
> I would prefer to change the name, or perhaps use "MUST NOT" instead of "strongly advised not" in the orange box. But neither of these is that important compared to the [NoInterfaceObject, ArrayClass], which is great. Thanks!

We can not use “MUST NOT” because then no interface can use it at all — not even getClientsRect() :). “SHOULD NOT” is the right technical term though. Are you fine with that?

Greetings,
Dirk
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 19:04:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:22 UTC