on classes from the SHACL vocabulary
on constraints
on poor wording and loose terminology for prefix handling
comment about SHACL Status of This Document
on the closing of ISSUE-107
on the closing of ISSUE-106
on the closing of ISSUE-163
on the closing of ISSUE-155
on the closing of ISSUE-142
the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
- Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
on literals as shapes
fun with sh:hasShape
on property constraints vs focus node constraints
on sh:Shape vs sh:shape
Validating instances based on other instances
on definition and declaration
On representation and typing
on ontologies/vocabulary
on entailment
on evaluation
divergence in the definition of sh:minCount
- Re: divergence in the definition of sh:minCount
a general comment on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), W3C,Editor's Draft 22 September 2016
on access to the shapes graph in SHACL
- Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL
- Re: on access to the shapes graph in SHACL
on undefined in SHACL
on recursion in SHACL
on property paths in SHACL
on failure in SHACL
Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/
- Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/
- Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/
- Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/
- Order of filters (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/)
- $shapesGraph (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/)
- Union operations on graphs (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/)
- Deep copy (was: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/)
- Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/
Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration
- Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration
- Re: Labels for literals in sh:in enumeration