Re: on the closing of ISSUE-106

The resolution was based on a specific set of changes in the specification 
which is identified in the resolution:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-106 as addressed by this change: 
https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/compare/da0f0fbdc4...8e8401ab9d 
See https://www.w3.org/2016/09/27-shapes-minutes.html#resolution05

If you feel the change hasn't addressed the issue, please, let us know 
what else would need to be done from your point of view.

Thank you.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud




From:   "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
To:     public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Date:   09/28/2016 06:25 AM
Subject:        on the closing of ISSUE-106



ISSUE-106 appears to have been closed based on it being an editorial 
issue/
See 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Sep/0050.html


The text of ISSUE-106 is:

6.2.3 mentions sh:annotationValue, but the use of this property is not 
specified.
6.2.3 allows sh:annotationVarName to be missing but the behaviour in this 
case
is not specified.

These are not editorial concerns.


Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications