W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > September 2016

Re: on the closing of ISSUE-107

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:48:09 +0200
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Message-Id: <OF16649B97.FE86A8A1-ONC125803C.0050193A-C125803C.00514DFD@notes.na.collabserv.com>
The resolution was not based on a claim that the issue was editorial. The 
resolution reads:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-107 leaving annotation properties as currently 
specified
See https://www.w3.org/2016/09/27-shapes-minutes.html#resolution06

You pointed out that two different mechanisms were used and one would be 
better. The WG acknowledged your point but decided to leave the spec as 
is.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud




From:   "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
To:     "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Date:   09/28/2016 06:30 AM
Subject:        on the closing of ISSUE-107



It appears that ISSUE-107 was closed based on it being an editorial issue.
See 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Sep/0050.html


The text of ISSUE-107 is

Annotation properties use sh:annotationVarName to provide the SPARQL 
variable
name to use. Arguments use the local part of their IRI. It would be better 
to
have one mechanism.

This is not an editorial issue.


Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 14:48:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:44 UTC