- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:38:36 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Peter, would this suggestion work better for you? I assume someone could argue that "applied" is not defined. Holger On 28/09/2016 1:44, Karen Coyle wrote: > Filter shapes must be ... > - applied to the data graph > ... before validating.... > > > On 9/26/16 4:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone >> suggest alternative wording? >> >> "Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes >> or constraints." >> >> Thanks, >> Holger >> >> >> On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> How is a shape "validated"? >>> >>> This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially >>> quoted. >>> >>> peter >>> >>> On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>>> Replaced with "validated": >>>> >>>> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Holger >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated >>>>> shapes or >>>>> constraints." >>>>> >>>>> Evaluation is not defined. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> peter >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:39:31 UTC