W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > September 2016

Re: on evaluation

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:38:36 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <c7c77745-7bf1-bc73-4850-718a16aef956@topquadrant.com>
Peter, would this suggestion work better for you? I assume someone could 
argue that "applied" is not defined.

Holger



On 28/09/2016 1:44, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Filter shapes must be ...
>  - applied to the data graph
> ... before validating....
>
>
> On 9/26/16 4:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone
>> suggest alternative wording?
>>
>> "Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes
>> or constraints."
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Holger
>>
>>
>> On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> How is a shape "validated"?
>>>
>>> This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially
>>> quoted.
>>>
>>> peter
>>>
>>> On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>>> Replaced with "validated":
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Holger
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>>>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated
>>>>> shapes or
>>>>> constraints."
>>>>>
>>>>> Evaluation is not defined.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> peter
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:44 UTC