- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 06:40:43 -0700
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Peter, how would you describe the action that takes place then? Because there is an implied action and work flow. Implemented? executed? enforced? resolved? (I'm running through the thesaurus entries.) kc On 9/27/16 3:43 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > For starters, filter shapes are not "applied to the data graph", so, no. > > peter > > > On 09/27/2016 03:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Peter, would this suggestion work better for you? I assume someone could argue >> that "applied" is not defined. >> >> Holger >> >> >> >> On 28/09/2016 1:44, Karen Coyle wrote: >>> Filter shapes must be ... >>> - applied to the data graph >>> ... before validating.... >>> >>> >>> On 9/26/16 4:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>>> Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone >>>> suggest alternative wording? >>>> >>>> "Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes >>>> or constraints." >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Holger >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>>> How is a shape "validated"? >>>>> >>>>> This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially >>>>> quoted. >>>>> >>>>> peter >>>>> >>>>> On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >>>>>> Replaced with "validated": >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Holger >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>>>>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated >>>>>>> shapes or >>>>>>> constraints." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Evaluation is not defined. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> peter >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 13:41:27 UTC