- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:53:38 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
So this is legal SHACL then? What happens if this shape is used in SHACL? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications On 09/27/2016 03:44 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > The rdfs:range of sh:shape is sh:Shape, and the "Value Type" is sh:Shape, too. > None of these enforce formal syntactic constraints. We could add a sh:nodeKind > restriction to sh:shape in the SHACL.ttl file, but haven't done so for other > properties either. > > Holger > > > On 28/09/2016 4:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> It appears to me that >> >> [prefix declarations] >> >> s:s1 rdf:type sh:Shape ; >> sh:shape 7 . >> >> is a syntactically correct shapes graph. >> >> Is this so? If not, what makes it not be so? >> >> >> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> Nuance Communications >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:54:09 UTC