- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:38:12 +1000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone suggest alternative wording? "Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes or constraints." Thanks, Holger On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > How is a shape "validated"? > > This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially quoted. > > peter > > On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Replaced with "validated": >> >> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9 >> >> >> Holger >> >> >> >> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated shapes or >>> constraints." >>> >>> Evaluation is not defined. >>> >>> >>> peter >>> >>
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 23:38:53 UTC