W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > September 2016

Re: on evaluation

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:38:12 +1000
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <3039dcdb-085a-b848-0ff6-d5289e293ac8@topquadrant.com>
Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone 
suggest alternative wording?

"Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes 
or constraints."

Thanks,
Holger


On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> How is a shape "validated"?
>
> This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially quoted.
>
> peter
>
> On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> Replaced with "validated":
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9
>>
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>>
>> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated shapes or
>>> constraints."
>>>
>>> Evaluation is not defined.
>>>
>>>
>>> peter
>>>
>>
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 23:38:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:44 UTC