Re: on literals as shapes from Holger Knublauch on 2016-09-27 (public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from September 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:44:45 +1000
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <4ccd5265-33fd-175a-3d6e-f6a6772e7d0b@topquadrant.com>

The rdfs:range of sh:shape is sh:Shape, and the "Value Type" is 
sh:Shape, too. None of these enforce formal syntactic constraints. We 
could add a sh:nodeKind restriction to sh:shape in the SHACL.ttl file, 
but haven't done so for other properties either.

Holger

On 28/09/2016 4:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> It appears to me that
>
> [prefix declarations]
>
> s:s1 rdf:type sh:Shape ;
>    sh:shape 7 .
>
> is a syntactically correct shapes graph.
>
> Is this so?  If not, what makes it not be so?
>
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:45:22 UTC