Re: on literals as shapes

The rdfs:range of sh:shape is sh:Shape, and the "Value Type" is 
sh:Shape, too. None of these enforce formal syntactic constraints. We 
could add a sh:nodeKind restriction to sh:shape in the SHACL.ttl file, 
but haven't done so for other properties either.

Holger


On 28/09/2016 4:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> It appears to me that
>
> [prefix declarations]
>
> s:s1 rdf:type sh:Shape ;
>    sh:shape 7 .
>
> is a syntactically correct shapes graph.
>
> Is this so?  If not, what makes it not be so?
>
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>