W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > September 2016

Re: on evaluation

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:43:37 -0700
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <9907449d-d88c-691f-c2de-1eb280a2b897@gmail.com>
For starters, filter shapes are not "applied to the data graph", so, no.

peter


On 09/27/2016 03:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Peter, would this suggestion work better for you? I assume someone could argue
> that "applied" is not defined.
> 
> Holger
> 
> 
> 
> On 28/09/2016 1:44, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> Filter shapes must be ...
>>  - applied to the data graph
>> ... before validating....
>>
>>
>> On 9/26/16 4:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>> Does anyone else find this sentence unclear? If yes, could someone
>>> suggest alternative wording?
>>>
>>> "Filter shapes MUST be validated before validating the associated shapes
>>> or constraints."
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Holger
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27/09/2016 1:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>>> How is a shape "validated"?
>>>>
>>>> This problem even affects the second half of the sentence I initially
>>>> quoted.
>>>>
>>>> peter
>>>>
>>>> On 09/26/2016 12:18 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>>>>> Replaced with "validated":
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d4fbdebd7044cd79f35985a75a54994ea3facde9
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Holger
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/09/2016 15:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>>>>> "Filter shapes MUST be evaluated before validating the associated
>>>>>> shapes or
>>>>>> constraints."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Evaluation is not defined.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 22:44:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:44 UTC