Thank you Peter, can you check if the latest version has any issues? Best, Dimitris On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > Your reasoning is incorrect. > > It appears that what you mean by "deep copy" is somewhat related to its > meaning in LISP. The meaning of "deep copy" that most readers will know > of is > is meaning in current object-oriented languages, where all objects > reachable > by inter-object links are copied. This would end up copying the entire > portion of the RDF graph reachable from the head list node, which is not > what > is desired here. > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications > > > On 09/22/2016 10:38 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > > On 23/09/2016 11:36, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> > >>> Deep copy > >>> > >>> "a deep copy of sh:path as its sh:path" What is "deep copy" in this > >> context? > >>> Comment (HK): I have attempted to clarify this here: > >> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ > d3f8f858f95b010d1f2a0e4681da203bcbfbc217 > >> > >>> Comment (kc): Unless "deep copy" has some pre-defined meaning > that I > >> am unaware of, I would suggest dropping it and saying: The value of > sh:path > >> of each validation result must copy all triples that are required by > the <a > >> href="#path-syntax">SHACL well-formed path syntax rules</a>from the > >> <a>shapes graph</a> into the graph containing the validation results. > >>> Comment (HK): The first google match of "deep copy" is pretty > close to > >> what I wanted to express, so I believe the term should be familiar to > many > >> people and may be helpful for implementers. Also I had surrounded the > term > >> with "...". Anyway, I have no strong opinion and let others decide. > >> > >> The extra wording is helpful. However, "deep copy" in > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_copying#Deep_copy is different. > Either > >> drop "deep copy" or point to an appropriate definition. > > > > Almost every English word is somehow overloaded with multiple meanings. I > > believe your linked deep copy is quite appropriate for what I am trying > to > > express. If anyone has a suggestion on how to explain this better, please > > provide a complete replacement of the sentence - just dropping the term > does > > not work. > > > > Thanks, > > Holger > > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http://aligned-project.eu Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILTReceived on Saturday, 24 September 2016 14:30:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:44 UTC