- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:25:16 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
On 27/09/2016 6:03, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2016-09-26 11:26-0700] >> ex:ShapeWithIdenticalPath >> a sh:shape ; >> sh:property [ >> sh:predicate ex:mother . >> ] >> sh:property [ >> sh:path ex:mother . >> ] . >> >> appears to use the wrong one. >> >> All occurrences of both should be checked. Fixed, thanks for pointing this out: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/53710ca22ddc7db01ebf6789ec4f509e4152c712 >> >> >> It would be better not to use two names that differ only in capitalization, >> particularly for a letter where the difference can be difficult to detect. > I strongly endorse sh:hasShape for the property. I understand that > there's also a provisional SPARQL function with this name but I'm not > sure that's actualy a conflict given that the SPARQL function is > supposed to be an implementation of the property. Eric, how is sh:shape different from, say, sh:class in this respect? Wouldn't we then also have to rename sh:class to sh:hasClass? Holger
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 22:26:10 UTC