Hi Peter and thank you for your feedback I tried to work further on this here <https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/339b655f82463161b954684ea205b3c67fb483e8>, let me know if this resolves the issue. Thanks, Dimitris On Friday, September 23, 2016, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: > On 23/09/2016 11:36, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> >> union operations on data graphs and shapes graphs >>> >>> It is unclear just what the data graph and the shapes graph are. There is >>> >> wording that both of these cannot be changed. However, there is also >> wording >> that various kinds of union operations are to be performed on shapes and >> data graphs. >> >>> Comment (HK): The only place I could find "union" was about handling >>> >> of owl:imports, which states that the result of this union is used as >> shapes >> graph. This looks OK to me. Could you clarify what you mean? >> >>> Comment (DK): I tried to make the wording clearer here: >>> >> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/b6fd2db5719cc9c9bd >> ec464acdd2aefc8d0b5b68 >> >> I don't find this much better. If the shapes graph and the data graph >> cannot be changed then there should not be wording about unioning, >> extending, or otherwise modifying the shapes graph or the data graph. >> >> > Dimitris, do you have time to revise this further? I guess we need to find > a different term than "shapes graph" for the originally supplied graph. The > real shapes graph may be the one that is the output of the transitive > closure process. > > Thanks > Holger > >
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2016 13:54:09 UTC