public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from July 2014 by author

Antoine Isaac

• Re: in between position (Tuesday, 22 July)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Reminder of the workshop and its outcome (Tuesday, 22 July)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Thursday, 31 July)
• IBM Position on OSLC Shapes, SPARQL, SPIN, and ShEx (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)

Bernard Vatant

• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Thursday, 31 July)
• Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)

Bosch, Thomas

• AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Sunday, 27 July)
• AW: OWL is hard? (Sunday, 27 July)
• Mapping of Description Set Profiles (DSPs) to SPIN (Saturday, 26 July)
• Mapping from OWL 2 to SPIN (Saturday, 26 July)
• AW: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Friday, 25 July)
• AW: Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation (Friday, 25 July)
• AW: Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation (Thursday, 17 July)

Dam, Jesse van

• RE: in between position (Tuesday, 22 July)
• RE: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Monday, 21 July)
• RE: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• comparing to OWL and SPIN (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 14 July)

Dave Reynolds

• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Database of Requirements on RDF Validation: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation (Thursday, 24 July)
• Thoughts on validation requirements (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Wednesday, 2 July)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: implementing ShEx recursive shapes (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: non-normative reference to Z in ShEx def (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: question about ShEx values (Saturday, 19 July)
• clinical data value set example [Was: Re: question about ShEx values] (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: question about ShEx values (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: RDF validation must compile down to SPARQL (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: bugs in Eric's implementation of RDF shapes (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Tuesday, 1 July)

Evren Sirin

• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 31 July)
• Semantic Web Languages Architecture diagram (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: A view from outside (Saturday, 26 July)
• OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile (Thursday, 24 July)
• Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Tuesday, 22 July)
• TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Wednesday, 2 July)

Irene Polikoff

• RE: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• RE: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• RE: in between position (Tuesday, 22 July)
• RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: in between position (Tuesday, 22 July)

Jeremy J Carroll

• reworking charter …. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)

Jerven Bolleman

• Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Tuesday, 15 July)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Re: A view from outside (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: RDF validation must compile down to SPARQL (Friday, 18 July)
• RDF validation must compile down to SPARQL (Friday, 18 July)
• Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Tuesday, 15 July)

John Snelson

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Wednesday, 2 July)

john.walker

• Re: "What if" thoughts on a class of shape use cases (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: A view from outside (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)
• ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Tuesday, 1 July)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: implementing ShEx recursive shapes (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: question about ShEx values (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: bugs in Eric's implementation of RDF shapes (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 3 July)

Jose María Alvarez Rodríguez

• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)

Karen Coyle

• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 7 July)

Kendall Clark

• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• OWL is hard? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)

Lars Marius Garshol

• Re: A view from outside (Friday, 25 July)
• A view from outside (Friday, 25 July)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: A view from outside (Saturday, 26 July)

Michel Dumontier

• Re: OWL is hard? (Friday, 25 July)

Olivier Rossel

• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: question about ShEx values (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG (Thursday, 10 July)

Oreste Signore

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Wednesday, 2 July)

Paul

• Re: Should we say "data model"? (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• in between position (Tuesday, 22 July)

Paul Davidson

• [OFFICIAL] - RE: name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)

Paul Hermans

• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Tuesday, 15 July)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Wondering about an example of closed world validation (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Sunday, 27 July)
• Re: OSLC Resource Shapes implemented with SPIN (Saturday, 26 July)
• implementing ShEx recursive shapes (Saturday, 26 July)
• non-normative reference to Z in ShEx def (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: Reminder of the workshop and its outcome (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Using OWL for RDF constraint checking and closed-world recognition (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: owl for interface constraints (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: question about ShEx values (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: question about ShEx values (Friday, 18 July)
• question about ShEx values (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• bugs in Eric's implementation of RDF shapes (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG (Thursday, 10 July)

Sandro Hawke

• name of the group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Monday, 21 July)
• owl for interface constraints (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: prospective charter for a shapes validation WG (Thursday, 10 July)

Simon Spero

• Re: ShEx relation to SPIN/OWL (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements (Wednesday, 30 July)
• "What if" thoughts on a class of shape use cases (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: OWL is hard? (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx. (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: TopQuadrant's position on RDF Shapes working group (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Questions about ShEx Z specification (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: owl for interface constraints (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack of validated vision. (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Shapes - sub-classes / sub-properties (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)

Solbrig, Harold R.

• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: using Shape Expressions to validate RDF graphs (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: cyclic rules (Thursday, 10 July)

Steve Speicher

• Re: Draft: SPIN Minimum Profile (Wednesday, 23 July)

Thomas Baker

• Re: Shapes/ShEx or the worrying issue of yet another syntax and lack (Saturday, 19 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2014 23:16:38 UTC