W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:47:58 -0700
Message-ID: <53D51F2E.3060005@gmail.com>
To: "Bosch, Thomas" <Thomas.Bosch@gesis.org>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On 07/27/2014 02:36 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Dimitris
> Although I do not have any industry experience in this field, I have the
> following to note from my related research.
> If we want RDF to become mainstream we shouldn't expect people to learn OWL,
> logics & Manchester syntax in order to formulate or understand a simple
> constraint.
> They should exist somehow but should be moved as many levels up as possible.
> Similarly for SPARQL.

What do you suggest should be the minimal level of learning to be able to 
formulate or understand a simple constraint?  Please include examples of 
simple constraints that can be formulated and understood using only this level 
of learning.

Received on Sunday, 27 July 2014 15:48:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC