- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 08:47:58 -0700
- To: "Bosch, Thomas" <Thomas.Bosch@gesis.org>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On 07/27/2014 02:36 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote: > Hi Dimitris > > > > Although I do not have any industry experience in this field, I have the > following to note from my related research. > > If we want RDF to become mainstream we shouldn't expect people to learn OWL, > logics & Manchester syntax in order to formulate or understand a simple > constraint. > They should exist somehow but should be moved as many levels up as possible. > Similarly for SPARQL. > What do you suggest should be the minimal level of learning to be able to formulate or understand a simple constraint? Please include examples of simple constraints that can be formulated and understood using only this level of learning. peter
Received on Sunday, 27 July 2014 15:48:29 UTC