Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements

On 07/27/2014 02:36 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Dimitris
>
>
>
> Although I do not have any industry experience in this field, I have the
> following to note from my related research.
>
> If we want RDF to become mainstream we shouldn't expect people to learn OWL,
> logics & Manchester syntax in order to formulate or understand a simple
> constraint.
> They should exist somehow but should be moved as many levels up as possible.
> Similarly for SPARQL.
>

What do you suggest should be the minimal level of learning to be able to 
formulate or understand a simple constraint?  Please include examples of 
simple constraints that can be formulated and understood using only this level 
of learning.

peter