- From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:11:28 +0200
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Imho, it is crucial to involve data definition people in the process. Vendors such as C&P or TopQuadrant probably have some connections for that. Otherwise we will miss some crucial requirements and eventually create yet another inadequate solution. Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 22 juil. 2014 à 13:26, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> a écrit : > > As far as I can think of, SPIN does not have support for this feature. I am sure it could be added if people find it relevant enough. Our goal designing SPIN was simplicity - it really was no rocket science to "invent" neither is it rocket science to use. > > Does ShEx have support for [insert a random SPARQL feature here]? > > Maybe we should really agree on a definite list of requirements before starting a random feature bake-off. And depending on who writes those requirements, the outcome is pre-determined. > > Thanks, > Holger > > >> On 7/22/14, 8:35 PM, Olivier Rossel wrote: >> Hi all. >> I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature coming from RelaxNG: >> "extending and overriding shapes" >> >> cf the discussion here >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format#Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions >> >> This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data descriptions on the long term (in standards, for example). >> >> I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature. >> True? > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 12:12:02 UTC