W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Flexible schema inclusions and overloading in ShEx.

From: Olivier Rossel <olivier.rossel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:11:28 +0200
Message-Id: <7894F26C-B17C-4865-8832-B01A428DC9AB@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Imho, it is crucial to involve data definition people in the process. Vendors such as C&P or TopQuadrant probably have some connections for that.
Otherwise we will miss some crucial requirements and eventually create yet another inadequate solution.

Envoyé de mon iPhone

> Le 22 juil. 2014 à 13:26, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> a écrit :
> 
> As far as I can think of, SPIN does not have support for this feature. I am sure it could be added if people find it relevant enough. Our goal designing SPIN was simplicity - it really was no rocket science to "invent" neither is it rocket science to use.
> 
> Does ShEx have support for [insert a random SPARQL feature here]?
> 
> Maybe we should really agree on a definite list of requirements before starting a random feature bake-off. And depending on who writes those requirements, the outcome is pre-determined.
> 
> Thanks,
> Holger
> 
> 
>> On 7/22/14, 8:35 PM, Olivier Rossel wrote:
>> Hi all.
>> I would like to point out that ShEx has some ideas about a nice feature coming from RelaxNG:
>> "extending and overriding shapes"
>> 
>> cf the discussion here
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Discussion_SHEX_format#Discussion_2.2C_redefining_and_including_other_SHEX_definitions
>> 
>> This is really elegant and handy feature when you deal with data descriptions on the long term (in standards, for example).
>> 
>> I am not sure SPIN or ICV have any support for an equivalent feature.
>> True?
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 12:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC