W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

Re: comparing to OWL and SPIN

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:25:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHb4Hxg3zdBTPiK9HUPqySnDsKagfamO=+sSQ1DjHXfxs+dekQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dam, Jesse van" <jesse.vandam@wur.nl>, "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry if you misunderstood my statement, I did say it has to be true, but
>> is something that could be tested. I could be that the Regular Expression
>> derivatives algorithm, although much less expressive then OWL, is
>> outperforming the OWL reasoners.  Only some research and testing will give
>> an useful answer, but certainly something nice to consider and test.
>>
>
> Yes, this could be tested.  I expect that StarDog ICV will perform very
> well, as it works by translation into SPARQL queries.
>

We'd like to extend our implementation to handle constraint checking
incrementally, but that's orthogonal to the approach or to standardization
issues IMO.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 13:26:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC