W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

OWL is hard?

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:46:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHb4Hxiqvk=GfUxewFexUfJQNdj1FVuhimtaC6K03jjOzyhaVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
>
>
>  foaf:Person class,
>  foaf:name 1 1,
>  foo:email 1 1,
>  foo:phone 0 * .



> Some Manchester syntax (again corrections welcome)



> Class: foaf:person
>    foaf:name exactly 1
>    foo:email exactly 1
>    foo:phone min 0


I'm not sure why people say ICV is hard or OWL is confusing. Manchester OWL
is by far the most elegant option on the table and this nearly random
example is a good demonstration of that.

Cheers,
Kendall Clark
Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 17:47:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC