W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

AW: Validation and documentation using SPIN templates examples and an extension for heuristics/expectations

From: Bosch, Thomas <Thomas.Bosch@gesis.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:27:56 +0000
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, public-rdf-sha. <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>, "DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Message-ID: <034521477E185643888861D1B4EFF0F5015CA29EEB@SVMAEXC01.gesis.intra>

On 7/24/14, 7:36 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote:
Another related use case is that if a constraint violation happens, the system could *suggest* a fix. In SPIN we do this by creating INSERT/DELETE template calls as part of a constructed spin:ConstraintViolation. This can be exposed by user interfaces via a button "Fix me".

I think this should be out of the scope of the validation language but the language should support such hooks with generic annotations [1] that other tools can interpret
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-shapes/2014Jul/0208.html

> Yeah, suggesting fixes is really a nice-to-have, and this feature has not been used much so far in our experience. Fortunately we are in RDF where anybody can add extra triples to an existing object, e.g. add >"annotations" to a constructed spin:ConstraintViolation object. That's one reason why we went with constraint definitions based on CONSTRUCT.

Hi all,

I recorded the discussed requirements in the RDF validation requirements database: http://purl.org/net/rdf-validation


Please feel free to add your thoughts to the database.


Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 15:28:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC