W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > July 2014

Re: AW: Thoughts on validation requirements

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:07:49 -0700
Message-ID: <53D57835.7060705@gmail.com>
To: "Bosch, Thomas" <Thomas.Bosch@gesis.org>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On 07/27/2014 02:36 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Dimitris
> Regarding ShEx:
> - I am also unconfortable with the un-typed validation but I also see the need
> to support it. Unless of course RDF somewhere specifies that every resource
> MUST have a rdf:type. This however should not be the primary focus of ShEx
> since it is not the common case.


I'm still trying to figure out how ShEx is supposed to be used for validation. 
  I could make some guesses, but I think that it would be better for someone 
how was involved with ShEx to tell me.

Received on Sunday, 27 July 2014 22:08:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC