- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:07:49 -0700
- To: "Bosch, Thomas" <Thomas.Bosch@gesis.org>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On 07/27/2014 02:36 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote: > Hi Dimitris > [...] > Regarding ShEx: > > - I am also unconfortable with the un-typed validation but I also see the need > to support it. Unless of course RDF somewhere specifies that every resource > MUST have a rdf:type. This however should not be the primary focus of ShEx > since it is not the common case. [...] I'm still trying to figure out how ShEx is supposed to be used for validation. I could make some guesses, but I think that it would be better for someone how was involved with ShEx to tell me. peter
Received on Sunday, 27 July 2014 22:08:19 UTC