- From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:38:51 +0300
- To: "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 13:39:48 UTC
Hi all, I noticed that at the moment you do not handle sub-classes & sub-properties. In a previous thread you mentioned that ShEx want to stand somewhere like one step above syntactic validation so is this something out of the ShEx scope? This can be easily achieved with SPARQL1.1 and property paths - when the shape is evaluated in SPARQL (to be clear). However, it needs the schema to get the relations. Ideally this could be enabled by default in ShEx and a special directive could point to the schema(s) Or a special notation could mark if we want to match strictly <Issue> or any subclass such as: <CodingIssue> a owl:Class; rdfs:subClassOf <Issue> . Any thoughts, comments on this? Best, Dimtiris -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Research Group: http://aksw.org Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 13:39:48 UTC