On 07/11/2014 01:07 PM, Solbrig, Harold R. wrote: > Another way to look at this is that the domain of shape expressions is RDF > Graph. Shape expressions have (almost) nothing to do with people, spouses, > etc. It does appear that this is the case. Pity. > They make assertions about triples — the target of anything that appears > as the subject of a triple with a predicate “spouse” will be the subject of > another triple whose predicate is rdf:type and target is foaf:person. How can this be done with shape expressions? > While it would be useful if this were compatible with an OWL or other > assertion about marriage being strictly being between humans (vs. humans and > automobiles, for instance), ShEx is strictly about the graph itself — not its > interpretation. It allows an external user to know what assumptions can be > made about the contents — that every subject with rdf:type foaf:person will > always be the subject of an rdf:name triple as well. How can this be done with shape expressions? [...] peterReceived on Friday, 11 July 2014 20:32:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:39 UTC