- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:31:30 -0700
- To: "Solbrig, Harold R." <Solbrig.Harold@mayo.edu>, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>, "kcoyle@kcoyle.net" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- CC: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
On 07/11/2014 01:07 PM, Solbrig, Harold R. wrote: > Another way to look at this is that the domain of shape expressions is RDF > Graph. Shape expressions have (almost) nothing to do with people, spouses, > etc. It does appear that this is the case. Pity. > They make assertions about triples — the target of anything that appears > as the subject of a triple with a predicate “spouse” will be the subject of > another triple whose predicate is rdf:type and target is foaf:person. How can this be done with shape expressions? > While it would be useful if this were compatible with an OWL or other > assertion about marriage being strictly being between humans (vs. humans and > automobiles, for instance), ShEx is strictly about the graph itself — not its > interpretation. It allows an external user to know what assumptions can be > made about the contents — that every subject with rdf:type foaf:person will > always be the subject of an rdf:name triple as well. How can this be done with shape expressions? [...] peter
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 20:32:00 UTC